ecofx : Clothes dryer vs Clothesline


Share
____ environmental impact of a clothes dryer and a clothes line ____

Estimated carbon footprint, loss of natural habitat potential for one year, loss of plant and animal life potential for one year, and extinction potential, from producing, packaging, shipping and/or using these products or services.
-----------
+ Except for CO2 emissions, estimates are based on Habitat, Life, Extinction Formulas v2 by the XOEarth Team. +
Formulas use "human appropriated net primary production (HANPP)" to "CO2 emissions" correlation.
Estimates do not include the possible long-term effects of climate change and persistent toxins.
-----------
1 kg(kilogram)=2.2 lb(pounds)   1 m^2(square meter)=10.8 ft^2(square feet)
1 km(kilometers) = .62 mi(miles)   1 liter = .26 gallons
clothes dryer - appliance
(average residential electric clothes dryer)

CO2 from Tesco via WSJ.com [[#ref1]]

Product materials.


steel, plastic, copper, etc
? kg ? lb

CO2 released to dry one load of clothes.


2 kg
4.4 lb

Loss of natural habitat potential for one year to dry one load of clothes.


1.5 m^2
16.6 ft^2

Loss of native plant and animal life potential to dry one load of clothes.


4.8 kg
10.6 lb

How many loads of clothes dryed with this product to trigger 1 potential species extinction.


97.5 million

clothes line
(rope)

CO2 from Tesco via WSJ.com [[#ref1]]

Product materials.


usually polyester, plastic, cotton and/or nylon
? kg ? lb

CO2 released to dry one load of clothes.


0 kg
0 lb

Loss of natural habitat potential for one year to dry one load of clothes.


0 m^2
0 ft^2

Loss of native plant and animal life potential to dry one load of clothes.


0 kg
0 lb

How many loads of clothes dryed with this product to trigger 1 potential species extinction.


zero

==Ecomedia==
XOEarth.org/clothesline/

==References==
1. Six Products, Six Carbon Footprints
Wall Street Journal

==External links==
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clothes_dryer
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clothes_line

[[category:Products]] [[category:Choices]]

Share

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

One thought on “ecofx : Clothes dryer vs Clothesline

  • Stele Post author

    Six Products, Six Carbon Footprints, Transportation Less than 1% of footprint
    First came organic. Then came fair trade. Now makers of everything from milk to jackets to cars are starting to tally up the carbon footprints of their products. That's the amount of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases that get coughed into the air when the goods are made, shipped and stored, and then used by consumers.

    In the Gelsi household, reducing their carbon footprint is a family affair -- they even wrote a musical about it. MarketWatch reporter Steve Gelsi offers tips for saving the environment and saving money while doing so.

    So far, these efforts raise as many questions as they answer. Different companies are counting their products' carbon footprints differently, making it all but impossible for shoppers to compare goods. And even if consumers come to understand the numbers, they might not like what they find out.

    For instance, many products' global-warming impact depends less on how they're made than on how they're used. That means the easiest way to cut carbon emissions may be to buy less of a product or use it in a way that's less convenient

    Patagonia had a dose of reality calculating transportation was 1% of the carbon footprint.

    Patagonia Inc.'s Talus jacket looks like a naturalist's dream. In fact, its carbon footprint is 66 pounds. That, Patagonia notes on its Web site, is 48 times the weight of the jacket itself.

    Over the past year, the Ventura, Calif., outdoor-equipment maker has computed and posted on its Web site the carbon footprints of 15 of its products. Because most of Patagonia's products are made in Asia or Latin America and sold in the U.S., the company expected that a big chunk of the carbon footprints came from transportation. It was wrong.

    The fabric for the Talus is made in China, the zippers come from Japan, and the jacket is sewn in Vietnam. Yet all that transportation adds up to less than 1% of the product's total carbon footprint, Patagonia says. The majority of the footprint -- 71%, or about 47 pounds -- comes in producing the polyester, which originates with oil.

    "If we had listened to the rhetoric out there at the time, which was all around miles, we could have spent years rearranging our supply chain to reduce transportation, when really that's not the bulk of our concern," says Jill Dumain, Patagonia's director for environmental analysis. "There's a lot of reasons to have a tight supply chain, but environmentalism isn't one of them."
    https://www.greenm3.com/gdcblog/2008/10/6/six-products-six-carbon-footprints-transportation-less-than.html